Frameworks for AI systems operating under irreversible consequences — defense, national security, and other high-stakes environments where authority, accountability, and meaning must survive automation, uncertainty, and time compression.
Most failures pass validation.
They meet requirements.
They follow process.
Then a decision lands in the real world — and no one can clearly explain who owned it, why it was made, or how it could have been stopped.
That is not a technical failure.
It is a failure of control integrity.
This work focuses on systems where:
- decisions must be traceable
- authority must be explicit
- constraints must survive pressure
- human judgment must be operational, not symbolic
I don’t optimize for speed, persuasion, or adoption. I optimize for decisions that remain defensible when questioned later.