I work on decision architectures where authority, accountability, and meaning must remain intact under automation, oversight, and post-incident scrutiny.
Most failures pass validation.
They meet requirements.
They follow process.
Then a decision lands in the real world - and no one can clearly explain who owned it, why it was made, or how it could have been stopped.
That is not a technical failure.
It is an architectural one.
This work focuses on systems where:
- decisions must be traceable
- authority must be explicit
- constraints must survive pressure
- human judgment must be operational, not symbolic
I don’t optimize for speed, persuasion, or adoption. I optimize for decisions that remain defensible when questioned later.